Monika Ekstrand vs Elizabeth Mandlik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: In the last six months, Ekstrand outperformed Mandlik slightly, winning 43.08% of second serve points compared to Mandlik's 41.47%. Could this be a crucial factor in deciding the winner? Possibly.
• Return Game Analysis: Mandlik leads in returning second serves, winning 55.59% compared to Ekstrand's 51.42%. For first serve returns, Mandlik also has an edge with 36.34%, while Ekstrand stands at 33.79%.
• Pressure Handling: Ekstrand has a higher breakpoint save percentage at 51.26%, in contrast to Mandlik's 44.83%. Is Ekstrand more resilient under pressure? The stats suggest so.
• Overall Performance: Ekstrand has a better win rate of 68.09% over the past year, outpacing Mandlik's 59.02%.
• Surface Preferences: Ekstrand excels on clay with a 63% win rate, while Mandlik prefers hard courts, winning 60% of matches. Could the surface affect the match's outcome?
• Player Experience Level: Ekstrand has been more successful at the Challengers/ITF level, winning 65.71% of matches, slightly higher than Mandlik's 59.18%.
• Quality of Opponents: Ekstrand has faced players with a lower average rank (425.32) compared to Mandlik's opposition (314.16), indicating Mandlik has played against stronger competitors.
• Deciding Set Performance: Ekstrand boasts a strong deciding set win percentage of 71%, whereas Mandlik holds a 50% win rate in such situations.
• Break Point Conversion: Ekstrand is more successful at converting breakpoint opportunities with 48.11% compared to Mandlik's 41.52%.

Editorial Prediction (July 5, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performance trends, Ekstrand shows a consistent edge in multiple critical areas, such as second serve points won and breakpoint conversion. These traits suggest resilience and opportunism, which are essential for clutch situations and could weigh heavily in their favor.

Nevertheless, Mandlik's superior opponent quality and return stats indicate a proven capability to challenge higher-ranked players, especially in returning serves, which could be instrumental during break points.

The competition's final outcome might hinge on the playing surface; Ekstrand prefers clay, whereas Mandlik performs better on hard courts. Evaluating all key performance patterns, Ekstrand seems to display a slight edge in skill and consistency.

Given the comparison of elements such as pressure handling and success in deciding sets, Ekstrand is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.